5) 1st response to sanction

March 25th 2013

I disagree entirely with the decision that has been made.

Firstly i have not been officially notified in a letter as to the exact reason behind the decision to "disallow" my JSA payment, or generally notified in any way shape or form in an official (i.e written) capacity.

How can i disagree with something, when i do not know the specific claims against me?

For example in court, a charge must be brought against the defendant, in order for him/her to defend themselves from it. Here there has been no charge, other than stopping of JSA payment.

I am hereby requesting the exact reasoning for the stopping of my claim, in written form, signed and dated by the person who made the decision to stop my JSA payment.

If i am to defend myself from these fabricated charges, that have the effect of stopping my only living allowance, then i have the right to know

a) who is bringing these charges against me and

b) precisely what the charge(s) is/are.

This process of pre-judgemental punishment, i.e the stopping of benefits claims before the case has been heard, or the defendant has had the chance to defend their actions, is the complete opposite to the natural law system. I.e innocent until proven guilty. In my opinion, it makes a mockery of our entire legal system, and i personally question the legitimacy/legality of such behaviour.

As aforementioned, please provide written, specific reasoning for the "disallowance" of my JSA claim, so that i may have the ability to refute the allegations in due course.

Signed.

Dan "Redacted"

Original source:- https://www.facebook.com/J3D15/posts/10151399367931089