27) Unlawful state

13th Dec 2013

So once again, i will have to defend myself from an over-oppressive/ seemingly unlawful state. All the while maintaining a "jobsearch" for a reduced amount of £43.00 p/w.

With a 2 week "free-fall" period of no income whatsoever. Which included a period of what i suppose the government would call reasonable (mild) starvation. (about 1 or 2 very small meals per day).

All of which has been imposed unlawfully and in my opinion extremely unfairly in an effort to make politicians and local departments figures "look good".

I have refused to work for either zero hours contracts or through agencies as a matter of principle, however it seems this is what i have been deemed to be "not actively seeking work" for. Every job that i allegedly "could of applied for" is now via a job recruitment agency.

From here on, i will again be documenting in full, every encounter with the government. As i fully believe in transparency and accountability.

I will be uploading the ASE form, which again is the internal form that they used to make claims against me. (And which this time around they were EXTREMELY reluctant to give out, by excuse that they wanted to do things Digitally, to which i held my ground and insisted they give me the ability to take some time to refute the allegations against me.).

I have not heard back from the guardian yet, however i am going to collate all the previous encounters and the current one, hopefully into some form of blog (Good idea Mark, should of listened to ya dude before once again approaching the reasonably respectable papers and/or circulating such things in any way i can.

I will not suffer in silence, and i will do what i can to expose the wrongs that are being perpetrated against some of the most needy in this country.

The following was written directly after encountering the jobcentre, immediately after being "disallowed" So it was written approximately 8 or 9 days ago. In the interests of transparency i will include all encounters.


Approx 26/12/13:- *Editors Note/Error (I don't know why i wrote the 26/12/13 as the date there, as aforementioned it was approx 8-9 days earlier which would of been around the 4th or 5th Dec 2013.)


"Having just been down to the jobcentre, and being talked to by a completely unprofessional entity called Liz. Who rather than trying to allay any fears i had, in a way you might expect a civil servant to discharge her duties, instead kept trying to usher me towards the exit, accompanied by a couple of "security guards".

However all was not in vain. I've found out a couple of disturbing facts/procured some intel by the encounter.

My first request was for that of an ASE form, the internal form that is used when sending "decisions" to decision makers, it documents all the alleged positions that i could of apparently of applied for.

In the past i have used this form to defend myself, by seeing what allegations were being made against me, and then refuting and successfully overturning them in due course.

However this request was turned down. Apparently Liz said that there had been a "change of procedure" meaning instead that i had to attend another interview where any further details could be added. And there was no mention of the ASE form.

At this point i tried to make the understandable argument, that this is decreasing transparency, and that basically i have had my only living allowance stopped contrary not only to natural law, but now that i cannot actually dispute the claims against me. As i cannot see what i am alleged to of done/not done. Perhaps though Liz was somewhat confused, as further down the line, i'm assuming the right to appeal is still upheld, at least i hope to God it is. However this is indeed a change as before i was able to refute this from pretty much the offset, as far as my memory serves me. I will hold fire on this for the time being. I do not see in the name of transparency how giving access to the ASE form and the ability to dispute this, could/should be withheld, as in order to dispute the disallowance it will be a necessary disclosure.

So i said i would be documenting the case, and more than likely writing to the papers. I said i would be recording any conversations in the future. This instantly didn't go down well, as one of the private security guards piped up (i didn't catch the young fellows name) "this is private property, you can't film on it." I replied "this is a public building". To which i was given the somewhat startling response "this is crown property".

If this is indeed true. Then a few questions need to be asked really don't they? What the hell is the monarchy doing engaging in a political fashion? Administering civil service from a private property and then preventing the civil servants from being scrutinised due to this clause is completely contrary to an open transparent democracy.

I said "you have taken my picture on your security cameras without my prior permission on the way in, so i am entitled to make a copy myself".

At which point she said "you'll be searched on your way in, if you try to do that". To which i informed her that she wouldn't be searching me, as there would need to be a police officer present, and good reason of any intention of breaking a law.

I propose that maintaining transparency in critical governmental services such as the administration of welfare benefit, by means of documenting my dealings with said people, is in the national interest of this country, especially given the fact i have hard proof of corruption from my previous dealings. This among other terms, are what i will be telling the police officer, assigned to search\deal with me, if needs be."


LMV Gosh dan you must be really stressed

LMV Did you contact that woman we were talking about

Dan Kinobi Well L**** this is now the third time of actually having my ability to exist stopped, on extremely spurious grounds.(Twice it was overturned in the past, after writing a letter,as to why i disagree with the decision).  

I will be writing a similarly lengthy assignment this time of asking. I am also going to try and put all the dealings, dated and in chronological order, into a sort of "case study" in the form of a blog of sorts. So that it will be easily accessible by anyone who wishes to understand the situation more deeply. Once collated, the pieces will be in "place" so to speak. And from there i can pursue further illumination of the topic, in general. No i don't stress. Everything will be alright. Jesus said "don't worry". Lol so i don't.  I do what i have to do, and what i believe is right, that's all. 

Dan Kinobi And no, not yet L****, i figure i'll get everything together first, and see what the outcome of this latest disallowance will be, once i appeal. 

LMV Yes, Jesus also said the meek will inherited the world.  

Dan Kinobi They will;)

Dan Kinobi But by meek he didn't mean..apathetic i don't think. He means meek as in humble to one another. I bellieve we must still resist those that seek to undermine others, who seek to dominate or lord over people. Back in the day i believe he called such people the "pharisees", and i'm sure we all remember the woes of the pharisees, and how if you do such things, to cut a long story short, you suck major balls.  

Dan Kinobi As He came to serve us, so i think we should serve each other, i think this is what He meant by "meek". I interpret this in such a way, because if Jesus, who i believe is the son of God, was washing the sweaty/scabby feet of his disciples, then how much more is that a message that we should in good consciense serve (i.e help) each other.   

Dan Kinobi I don't know why i wrote the 26/12/13 as the date there, as aforementioned it was approx 8-9 days earlier which would of been around the 4th or 5th Dec 2013.


Original Source:- https://www.facebook.com/J3D15/posts/10151865173401089